Being on vacation during a breaking news story opens a window I’d sometimes just as soon snap shut. The news that NBC’s Washington bureau chief, Tim Russert, had collapsed and died of a heart attack on Friday afternoon didn’t reach me the way it would have if I’d been at work. If I’d been at the Tribune, I likely would have got the news via what’s known as an AP bulletin on the national or Washington wire feed. When big news happens, like a major court decision, a large rise or drop in the stock market or a death, the Associated Press puts out a one-line announcement called a bulletin. The bulletin is followed, usually within an hour and sometimes within minutes, by an abbreviated story that contains all the reporter knows about the event. What follows over the next 1 to 12 hours are a series of “write-thrus” in which the story is expanded, edited and updated with more information and background. In the event of the Russert death, someone in the newsroom (probably myself, Jeanne DePaul, my fellow dayside editor, or Craig Clohessy, the city editor) would announce it to the room. It’s a simple matter then to check the wire through the day for any other information I want.
Instead, I was at home enjoying a relaxed day of vacation. A friend called me with the news and I turned on the tube. That was about 2 p.m. By 3 p.m. I’d overdosed on broadcast and cable channel navel gazing. MSNBC went all Russert practically all day. Everyone from Keith Olbermann to Tom Brokaw waxed poetic about their fallen colleague, heaping praise upon him so lavishly I couldn’t help but wonder what Tim Russert would have thought about the Tim Russert coverage. I think he would have found it all a bit much. Or a lot much.
Don’t get me wrong. I have great respect for Russert’s contributions to the field of journalism and politics. His background as a lawyer prepared him well for the cross examinations his guests sometimes endured on “Meet the Press.” But NBC, and to a certain extent CNN as well, stumbled badly when they allowed this story about their friend’s death to be treated as a news story of such import that it required hours upon hours of coverage and endless teary tributes. It didn’t.
Tim Russert’s death is a tragedy for his family and a loss to the world of political journalism, but it is not of earthshaking importance to the rest of the world. It’s a sad day for journalism when the death of one of our own becomes more important than the flooding of a major portion of Iowa or any of a dozen news events that happened on Friday, June 13, 2008. When I finally tired of the laudatory coverage, I turned off broadcast and cable news, never hearing a thing about the levee break in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
In this case, NBC news badly needed the wise counsel of its Washington bureau chief. I like to think Russert would have told them the correct way to handle this event: 1 hour to the initial story, top-of-the-hour updates and a 1-hour tribute later that night or within the following week. Unfortunately, his NBC colleagues were grieving Tim Russert too hard to think … well, like Tim Russert.












